Layman’s Flashlight Reviews

EagleTac M2XC4

by Dave Wise on May.24, 2009, under 18650, CR123A, Cree XR-E, LED, Rechargeable

The M2 series of lights signifies EagleTac’s entry into the recent boom of small megalights putting out immense quantities of light from mid-size bodies. Generally built around the recent crop of quad-die LEDs EagleTac also offers this option of three individual single-chip diodes in the M2X version.

EagleTac M2XC4

EagleTac M2XC4



Meat and Potatoes

The M2 series does a fantastic job of rendering first impressions of both quality and a kind of compact immensity. The side by side 2×18650 (or 4xCR123A) battery “tube” is both quite unique in appearance and surprisingly comfortable to hold. It does present itself as fairly top-heavy at onset but this becomes significantly less noticeable after continued use. This overall design presents a compact sturdy tool that shows innovation. EagleTac has in some ways determined to boldly create their own path rather than follow existing design practices. Aesthetically, either you will love the appearance of the M2 series, or you will hate it. Most votes seem to be falling to the former.

The operation of the stock configured M2 series is, in a word, simple. Turn the ring for on, keep going for brighter. And let me tell you, it definitely does get brighter! Three R2 bin Cree XR-Es together are very capable of putting out a blindingly bright spot of light. The manufacturer rating of 800 lumens (calculated at the emitter) seems fairly accurate when optical losses are figured into the equation. The conjoined triple reflector is more than adequately capable of focusing this elephantine output into a tightly constrained beam that projects out over significant distance. As a bonus, this triumvirate of reflectors also serves to better smooth out the beam, assisting in removing most (though admittedly not all) of the dark ring typical to this LED form factor. The resultant profile is very usable over any distance without marked distortion except during intense white wall hunting expeditions.

EagleTac M2XC4

EagleTac M2XC4

Constructive Criticism

Even with the simplistic method of switching for the M2, some aspects could use help. As things stand currently, the “tactical strobe” mode is far too easy to access becoming an annoyance more often than it will ever prove useful. There is absolutely no tactile tell warning you of the impending disorientation. For that matter the ring has absolutely no tactile feedback whatsoever. This to me is a low hanging fruit. Even a minor click style detent system vaguely similar to offerings by Fenix or Surefire would be a huge improvement. This would be especially helpful for people who choose instead to use the optional clicky switch that was included in all preorders and early adopter purchases. Without some indicator, there is simply no way to guarantee that when you switch the light on, you will get any particular level of light that you may desire.

Speaking of the optional clicky switch, I would like to propose that this little unit could stand a redesign. The plastic used for the replacement tailcap, though it appears to be a well finished, quality polymer, also still looks like it would be too fragile for any serious impact. Plus, the installation of the switch module alters the ergonomics to the point where the light is, to me at least, rather uncomfortable to hold. Add to this some difficulty properly arranging the o-ring in the designated groove, coupled with difficulty extracting the minuscule assembly screws without marring, and I found that I vastly preferred the light with the original flat, tail-stand capable configuration. I quickly returned to this.

M2 Series clicky switch

M2 Series clicky switch

After my initial “Wow” period with this torch, I did begin to discover something I have since heard others mention as well. Upon first firing the M2X up, there is a brief flash of a higher level before the light settles down into your desired output. This is very reminiscent of something that occurred in older Fenix L2D and P2D models. It has since been corrected there, but it was rather unique to discover the same difficulties cropping up in another manufacturer now. The M2 series of lights are so much brighter, even on low power that this flash is less classified as painfully damaging to night vision and more merely annoying, but I would definitely encourage EagleTac to do away with it if at all possible.

Conclusions

The EagleTac M2XC4 may not have everything hammered out to perfection, but as a general rule it is impressive, both in light of its output capabilities, and its inherent proof that EagleTac is committed to continued innovation. An easy to handle size thanks to it’s side by side configuration, joined with both an ergonomic, simple switching method and enormous output is a winning combination. Their new flagship model is well worth the hype it initially received in this reviewers eyes.

EagleTac M2XC4

EagleTac M2XC4

Provided for review by the kind folks at:

Bookmark and Share
:

6 Comments for this entry

  • Denny

    Nice LED Flashligh. LED is really the future to all kinds of lighting!

  • Mike

    This is a great looking torch. Can anyone tell me if the main body and head are anodized metal or a polycarbonate? I understand the accessory tailswitch and selector ring are the latter.
    Many thanks in advance, Mike.

  • Dave Wise

    On my version they are definitely anodized Aluminum. I believe that they changed the tailcap to a polymer in the most recent revisions, but the head and body should still be Al.

  • Mike

    In your highly experienced and respected opinion Dave Wise, do you believe the new M2SC4 to be any better a thrower than either the SSCP7 or Tri R2 version of the M2? Not owning any of them, but hopeing too soon, i was thinking maybe the MC-E M bin CW might be a nice balance between spill and throw. Again, thanks in advance for your thoughts.

  • Dave Wise

    From what I have been able to deduce, the M2XC4 (Tri-XR-E) has the tightest focus of any of the three. I believe I read that the MC-E driven M2SC4 somewhat splits the difference between the floody P7 version and the Tri-XR-E. EagleTac mentioned a while back that they might want me to review the M2SC4 also, but I haven’t heard anything about that recently.

  • Kenny

    Eagletac should be releasing a new revised version of the M2, with SST-50 which would replace the MCE. the ETA should be end of july if there is no more delay.

    the M2XC4 (tri-XRE) should also be replaced by tri XPG but no sure whether its ETA will be the same as the SST-50 version or not.

Leave a Reply

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!