Comments on: EagleTac M2XC4 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/ Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:58:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dave Wise http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-992 Dave Wise Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:30:36 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-992 Excellent to hear. I should soon be getting a shot reviewing the SST-50 variant so I will get to write about their improvements to this line as well. Excellent to hear. I should soon be getting a shot reviewing the SST-50 variant so I will get to write about their improvements to this line as well.

]]> By: Mike http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-991 Mike Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:25:56 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-991 Hello, have recently purchased an M3C4-triR5, and it is all it appears, and more. Smooth ramping between 5 levels of output, and hidden flashing modes. Unfortunately, my example has one lazy emmiter ( at a guess 30-40% down on the other two )so it has been returned for repair. Hopefully i'll be reunited with it soon, cause in every other respect, its absolutely brilliant ( not a pun ). Keep up the great reviews. Best wishes from down under, Mike. Hello, have recently purchased an M3C4-triR5, and it is all it appears, and more. Smooth ramping between 5 levels of output, and hidden flashing modes. Unfortunately, my example has one lazy emmiter ( at a guess 30-40% down on the other two )so it has been returned for repair. Hopefully i’ll be reunited with it soon, cause in every other respect, its absolutely brilliant ( not a pun ). Keep up the great reviews.
Best wishes from down under, Mike.

]]> By: Kenny http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-762 Kenny Sun, 27 Jun 2010 08:08:03 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-762 Eagletac should be releasing a new revised version of the M2, with SST-50 which would replace the MCE. the ETA should be end of july if there is no more delay. the M2XC4 (tri-XRE) should also be replaced by tri XPG but no sure whether its ETA will be the same as the SST-50 version or not. Eagletac should be releasing a new revised version of the M2, with SST-50 which would replace the MCE. the ETA should be end of july if there is no more delay.

the M2XC4 (tri-XRE) should also be replaced by tri XPG but no sure whether its ETA will be the same as the SST-50 version or not.

]]> By: Dave Wise http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-752 Dave Wise Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:04:25 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-752 From what I have been able to deduce, the M2XC4 (Tri-XR-E) has the tightest focus of any of the three. I believe I read that the MC-E driven M2SC4 somewhat splits the difference between the floody P7 version and the Tri-XR-E. EagleTac mentioned a while back that they might want me to review the M2SC4 also, but I haven't heard anything about that recently. From what I have been able to deduce, the M2XC4 (Tri-XR-E) has the tightest focus of any of the three. I believe I read that the MC-E driven M2SC4 somewhat splits the difference between the floody P7 version and the Tri-XR-E. EagleTac mentioned a while back that they might want me to review the M2SC4 also, but I haven’t heard anything about that recently.

]]> By: Mike http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-751 Mike Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:31:06 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-751 In your highly experienced and respected opinion Dave Wise, do you believe the new M2SC4 to be any better a thrower than either the SSCP7 or Tri R2 version of the M2? Not owning any of them, but hopeing too soon, i was thinking maybe the MC-E M bin CW might be a nice balance between spill and throw. Again, thanks in advance for your thoughts. In your highly experienced and respected opinion Dave Wise, do you believe the new M2SC4 to be any better a thrower than either the SSCP7 or Tri R2 version of the M2? Not owning any of them, but hopeing too soon, i was thinking maybe the MC-E M bin CW might be a nice balance between spill and throw. Again, thanks in advance for your thoughts.

]]> By: Dave Wise http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-464 Dave Wise Sun, 16 May 2010 13:04:26 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-464 On my version they are definitely anodized Aluminum. I believe that they changed the tailcap to a polymer in the most recent revisions, but the head and body should still be Al. On my version they are definitely anodized Aluminum. I believe that they changed the tailcap to a polymer in the most recent revisions, but the head and body should still be Al.

]]> By: Mike http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-458 Mike Sun, 16 May 2010 07:06:51 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-458 This is a great looking torch. Can anyone tell me if the main body and head are anodized metal or a polycarbonate? I understand the accessory tailswitch and selector ring are the latter. Many thanks in advance, Mike. This is a great looking torch. Can anyone tell me if the main body and head are anodized metal or a polycarbonate? I understand the accessory tailswitch and selector ring are the latter.
Many thanks in advance, Mike.

]]> By: Denny http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/2009/05/eagletac-m2xc4/comment-page-1/#comment-79 Denny Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:20:10 +0000 http://www.laymanslights.venturous.org/blog/?p=251#comment-79 Nice LED Flashligh. LED is really the future to all kinds of lighting! Nice LED Flashligh. LED is really the future to all kinds of lighting!

]]>